Or Maybe He Just Needs to Spend More Time at the Salad Bar and Less Time at the Dessert Bar

Not sure if it is common knowledge or what, but Brady is wearing Mike Vrabel’s Ohio State jersey because the two had a bet going on who would win the game played between both of their alma maters, Brady of course being a Michigan guy.

Love the Ben Wallace story. We in the UniWorld need more coaches like Skiles.

Re: Ian Johnson’s numbers on his helmet. ESPN the magazine recently did a profile on him. Those are numbers of two offensive linemen who are hurt and out for the year. Something like that…

You forgot to mention that the Redskins finally went back to wearing the correct White over Burgandy uniforms for yesterday’s game.
-V

Peter Budaj was given that nickname to him by the equipment managers because he’s extremely religious. He donates 10% of his salary to his church.

Don’t you think that part of the problem with Carlos Lee’s jersey is that he’s putting it on over a sports coat? That sure would make it seem too small to me.

Interesting bit about the Wisconsin “W” copyright. I have never been a fan of the popular practice of high-schools mimicing college or professional logos (while usually just changing the color scheme), and it seems to happen a lot.

I was really interested in this article though, because last year while visiting back home I attended a football game at my old high school — whose name I won’t mention to prevent being a “whistle-blower”, but my home town begins with the letter “W”. I was disappointed because their old, very original “W” logo, had been replaced with one that basically mimiced the Wisconsin “W”. With any luck, this new devolopement will prompt school officals to revert back to the old one.

Perhaps the Astros designed the jersey for Lee under the assumption that he link

Speaking of school logo trademarks, I wonder how long it’ll be before the University of Kansas goes after link for their rip-off of the link logo.

Did anyone else think its somewhat ironic that in the same post talking about the Wisconsin trademark battle, that the pictures of Jeannette High’s helmets shows an exact copy of KU’s Jayhawk, except different coloring?

I don’t have any pictures, but during the Texas-Texas A&M game, on tv you could see that there were quite a few A&M players who’s “aTm” helmet decal was peeling off.

[quote comment=”24878″]Not sure if it is common knowledge or what, but Brady is wearing Mike Vrabel’s Ohio State jersey because the two had a bet going on who would win the game played between both of their alma maters, Brady of course being a Michigan guy.[/quote]

PHEW! I almost threw up when I saw that picture because I thought he wore it willingly. Wearing your buddy’s (and arch rival) uniform is OK just as long as there was a chance that your buddy will have to wear yours.

Speaking of school logo trademarks, I wonder how long itÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ll be before the University of Kansas goes after Jeannette High for their rip-off of the Jayhawk logo.

Or how why link hasn’t yet sued NC State?

I can see where Winsconsin wouldn’t want High schools copying their logo. As for the Kansas Jayhawk, there is so much history behind it and the artist was a KU alum, it seriously should not be used by Jeanette or any other high school.

Can you imagine if they had the Jeanette link?

Or the Jeanette Cardinal? How about the Jeanette Boilermakers or Hoosiers? Jeanettelink?

I’ve noticed that Kobe Bryant has been getting away with his link all season. I think the rule is beyond stupid, but what’s worse is that they don’t bother to enforce it.

I noticed on thursday that some of the Cowboys players link a Riddell bumper on their helmets, and some others link.

[quote comment=”24893″]I’ve noticed that Kobe Bryant has been getting away with his link all season. I think the rule is beyond stupid, but what’s worse is that they don’t bother to enforce it.[/quote]

He isn’t getting away with it because the link that wrist bands have to be worn on the wrist or forearm, not the bicep.

That rule the Bulls have about not wearing headbands is kind of silly, I won’t lie. But Big Ben needs to follow his teams rules. It’s inexcusable to disobey a coach over something stupid like not being able to wear a headband. Maybe he should worry more about link rather than what the the top of his head looks like.

[quote comment=”24881″]You forgot to mention that the Redskins finally went back to wearing the correct White over Burgandy uniforms for yesterday’s game.
-V[/quote]

link

[quote comment=”24881″]You forgot to mention that the Redskins finally went back to wearing the correct White over Burgandy uniforms for yesterday’s game.
-V[/quote]

AMEN! It’s about time the Redskins looked like the Redskins. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that they actually played like the Redskins yesterday too! Hopefully the white-on-white Bullsh*t is in the past.

I didn’t see this addressed in Sunday’s open thread comments section, but another footnote for the Southern-Grambling photo is that Grambling’s jerseys were designed by Big Boi of OutKast fame. Brief tidbit on that link and link.

what, no references of the 1957 throwbacks the Browns wore? Or did we all not really notice?

didn’t check so much into yesterday’s thread in case I missed the big discussion.

Wisconsin “W” ripoffs extend all the way down south to Texas. It was pretty funny going to high school games such as my old link, the Westwood Warriors link. Both blatent ripoffs of Wisconsin (with added indian feathers) and the Denver Broncos with different colors.

Then there is my old middle school that uses one of the most ripped off logos link

did the Browns even show up to play?

Southern’s unis are AMAZING. Grambling, too. But Southern’s are my new favorites.

Carlos Lee won’t be wearing a sports coat but he’ll still be mistaken for Mo Vaughn. Good God! you’re a pro baseball player, man, not a linebacker!

I personally do not see the big deal with the use of the logos by high school teams. In NY there are many high school teams that I know of that use another teams logo. link uses the exact same helmet as the University of Georgia, and link uses the “G” that is used by Georgia, Grambling, and most notably the Green Packers. The Florida State Spear logo is used by link, link, and link. link uses the Clemson Claw design, link uses the Michigan State Spartan (also only have logo on link like the Steelers), and link has the exact same helmet as UCONN. So to make sure that no other school uses a logo is absurd. There are far too many teams that do so to completely eliminate the imitation.

That’s a fun story with Brady and Vrabel. Carson Palmer and Tab Perry had a similar bet last season where Tab, from UCLA, had to wear Carson’s #3 USC jersey after the Trojans beat the Bruins.

This has probably been mentioned by Paul, or somebody else here, but why did the Colts switch to grey facemasks? Does it have something to do with the color affecting vision, was it aesthetics, or did they just need to add a third color for merchandising reasons? The blue looked better.

I think I would have liked Southern’s unis better if the leg strip matched the shoulder stripe. That or if they had white pants instead of solid gold all the way down.

i think i remember that the colts wanted to look more oldschool.

[quote comment=”24905″]I personally do not see the big deal with the use of the logos by high school teams. In NY there are many high school teams that I know of that use another teams logo. link uses the exact same helmet as the University of Georgia, and link uses the “G” that is used by Georgia, Grambling, and most notably the Green Packers. The Florida State Spear logo is used by link, link, and link. link uses the Clemson Claw design, link uses the Michigan State Spartan (also only have logo on link like the Steelers), and link has the exact same helmet as UCONN. So to make sure that no other school uses a logo is absurd. There are far too many teams that do so to completely eliminate the imitation.[/quote]

Funny you found this. I am a former player of Burnt Hills, and the new coach, Matt Shell changed color scheme and logo after 2001. The old was an Interlocking BH on one side and player number on the other, a la Alabama. Columbia from what I remember never had a UCONN C as of 2001

[quote comment=”24894″]I noticed on thursday that some of the Cowboys players link a Riddell bumper on their helmets, and some others link.[/quote]

This comes up every couple of weeks – Riddell is the “official” helmet of the NFL, so only they are allowed to have their logo on the front bumper. Players who wear Schutt or Adams helmets either have a blank bumper (like the Cowboys, Buccaneers, Steelers, or Chiefs – and I may be leaving some teams out) or have the team logo on the bumper.

New ESPN column is up — look link.

Can we officially end the suitcoat or dress shirt under the jersey tradition? I understand that the players want to look respectful and wear a tie, but could we compromise on a suitcoat over a turtleneck or some other shirt that will not look dumb for the rest of the press conference? It is link.

Paul is there legally a difference between a logo and just a letter? Because the “w” on the Wisconsin helmet is slanted it counts as a picture not a letter? I would find it hard to believe somebody could copywrite a letter (like the connecticut C, its a block letter c).

[quote comment=”24915″]Paul is there legally a difference between a logo and just a letter? Because the “w” on the Wisconsin helmet is slanted it counts as a picture not a letter? I would find it hard to believe somebody could copywrite a letter (like the connecticut C, its a block letter c).[/quote]

I know I am not Paul, but I might be able to shed some light here. What you are more likely to see than a copyright in this situation is a link. This matters for more than just the definition of “trademark” versus “copyright.” Trademarks can be renewed indefinitely, as long as they are used in commerce. Copyrights can eventually become public property. You can trademark anything that is representative of your product. That includes a letter, a font, a logo, or even a color. The government keeps a database called the link, or link.

It is a lot of fun to look up your link and see everything that they have trademarked. For instance, the Yankees still have the New York Highlanders trademarked.

Instead of suing the schools who use their W, Wisonsin ought to heavily recruit them. Good athletes out of those high schools might be encouraged to enroll at Wisconsin if they get to wear a logo or color scheme or mascot they are familiar with.

[quote comment=”24914″]Can we officially end the suitcoat or dress shirt under the jersey tradition? I understand that the players want to look respectful and wear a tie, but could we compromise on a suitcoat over a turtleneck or some other shirt that will not look dumb for the rest of the press conference? It is link.[/quote]

If players take off their jackets, the look is fine. They are going to a press conference announcing them to their new team and fans, and a suit should be their first choice – looking good and making a good impression.

It looks like Rafael Little is wearing a compression sleeve on his leg, not an attempt to imitate any nike-type sleeves on his leg. You can clearly see the separation between his compression shorts and the area around his knee since the pants, compression shorts and sleeve are all white. He probably has shin splints and is just trying to alleviate the pain.

Nice article about the eye black, Paul. You forgot to mention one of the most egregious abusers of eye black- John Randle. He used to cover half his face with eye black. I think he must have been inspired from a few too many viewings of “Any Given Sunday”. I’m pretty sure the NFL started to fine players who were covering more than their cheeks with the stuff because of him too.

Eye Black = John Randle, as Lipstick = Courtney Love

[quote comment=”24894″]I noticed on thursday that some of the Cowboys players link a Riddell bumper on their helmets, and some others link.[/quote]

This has been covered in the past, check out the archives. Basically, any NFL helmet that has either the team name in the nose bumper of the helmet or has a blank bumper is an Adams or a Schutt helmet. Riddell has the on field licensing agreement with the NFL so that only their company name can appear on NFL helmets. It’s the same reason that all uniforms and sideline apparel are made my Reebok. The NFL doesn’t allow other logos on the field other than those manufacturers with whom the league has an on field licensing agreement.

[quote comment=”24902″]did the Browns even show up to play?

Southern’s unis are AMAZING. Grambling, too. But Southern’s are my new favorites.

Carlos Lee won’t be wearing a sports coat but he’ll still be mistaken for Mo Vaughn. Good God! you’re a pro baseball player, man, not a linebacker![/quote]

As an Astros fan, I’m just glad we got someone other than Berkman in the lineup that can hit, so I don’t care how much of a fatass Lee is so long as he hits home runs for us. Let’s all remember that Babe Ruth didn’t exactly possess an athletic build either (and now I’m not comparing Lee to Ruth, just providing context). I think we can all agree though that it’s a good thing the Astros wear slimming pin stripes.

[quote comment=”24899″]what, no references of the 1957 throwbacks the Browns wore? Or did we all not really notice?

didn’t check so much into yesterday’s thread in case I missed the big discussion.[/quote]
Um…
Hit Ctrl-F and paste this:
“Now thatÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s right purty.”

anyone else notice that the pee-wee football team in the under armour commercial has the wisconsin “W” on their helmet.

[quote comment=”24920″]Nice article about the eye black, Paul. You forgot to mention one of the most egregious abusers of eye black- John Randle. He used to cover half his face with eye black. I think he must have been inspired from a few too many viewings of “Any Given Sunday”. I’m pretty sure the NFL started to fine players who were covering more than their cheeks with the stuff because of him too.

Eye Black = John Randle, as Lipstick = Courtney Love[/quote]

Jim, thanks for mentioning one of my favorite Vikings of the nineties. Talk about your link. You are right about the fines for excessive eye black starting with him as well. I thought it was a dumb fine, and I still do.

As for Big Ben, I still think it’s a stupid rule. Thanks, Paul, for putting it in your ESPN article. To me, it’s just a coach’s way of saying, ‘I can make you do this because I am the coach.’ If Skiles has a reason, let’s hear it. Otherwise, let link wear his damn headband!

Free the ‘Fro!

[quote comment=”24897″][quote comment=”24881″]You forgot to mention that the Redskins finally went back to wearing the correct White over Burgandy uniforms for yesterday’s game.
-V[/quote]

AMEN! It’s about time the Redskins looked like the Redskins. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that they actually played like the Redskins yesterday too! Hopefully the white-on-white Bullsh*t is in the past.[/quote]

I must disagree. I have hated the red pants from the day that the Redskins abandoned their cool yellow pants . . . how long has it been now, 25 or 30 years ago? The white-on-white was a welcome and long overdue change, so it is my hope that the red pants were a one-week aberration.

[quote comment=”24920″]Nice article about the eye black, Paul. You forgot to mention one of the most egregious abusers of eye black- John Randle.[/quote]

I totally intended to mention Randle — really! But I couldn’t find a good photo of him. And one reason for that was, I’m embarrassed to say, is that I mistakenly searched for pics of “John Randall.” How lame is that?! ARGGHHH!

I’ll mention Randle (and your great Courtney Love comparison) in a follow-up in my next column.

[quote comment=”24924″][quote comment=”24920″]Nice article about the eye black, Paul. You forgot to mention one of the most egregious abusers of eye black- John Randle. He used to cover half his face with eye black. I think he must have been inspired from a few too many viewings of “Any Given Sunday”. I’m pretty sure the NFL started to fine players who were covering more than their cheeks with the stuff because of him too.

Eye Black = John Randle, as Lipstick = Courtney Love[/quote]

Jim, thanks for mentioning one of my favorite Vikings of the nineties. Talk about your link. You are right about the fines for excessive eye black starting with him as well. I thought it was a dumb fine, and I still do.

As for Big Ben, I still think it’s a stupid rule. Thanks, Paul, for putting it in your ESPN article. To me, it’s just a coach’s way of saying, ‘I can make you do this because I am the coach.’ If Skiles has a reason, let’s hear it. Otherwise, let link wear his damn headband!

Free the ‘Fro![/quote]

Minna, no comment about the Polomalu in training from Paul’s article?

Rey Maualuga: link

[quote comment=”24930″]

Minna, no comment about the Polomalu in training from Paul’s article?

Rey Maualuga: link

Ahhhh, Matthew, you know me too well. I did, indeed, give Maualuga (another Samoan!) more than one look, but he’s in college which makes him waaaay too young for me. I’m already chickenhawkin’ with Troy P. Don’t want to be called a dirty old lady.

[quote comment=”24883″]Don’t you think that part of the problem with Carlos Lee’s jersey is that he’s putting it on over a sports coat? That sure would make it seem too small to me.[/quote]

That seemed pretty obvious to me too. I wouldn’t let Lee off the hook completely, though–as soon as “it ain’t goin’ to fit” popped into his brain, he should have slipped his damn sportcoat off.

[quote comment=”24928″]I have hated the red pants from the day that the Redskins abandoned their cool yellow pants . . . how long has it been now, 25 or 30 years ago? The white-on-white was a welcome and long overdue change, so it is my hope that the red pants were a one-week aberration.[/quote]

link > link.

On closer examination, link looks awfully similar to this link.

[quote comment=”24922″][quote comment=”24899″]what, no references of the 1957 throwbacks the Browns wore? Or did we all not really notice?

didn’t check so much into yesterday’s thread in case I missed the big discussion.[/quote]
Um…
Hit Ctrl-F and paste this:
“Now thatÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s right purty.”[/quote]

yes I saw the pic, but there was no real mention of it…and the helmet numbers.

Minna, I bet you like eye black just because it’s black. What would you think if the Vikings designed a black alternate jersey?

Oh, and thanks to those who answered my goalie mask question yesterday.

Regarding the trademarking of letters, Michigan State and Syracuse just settled a argument over the “Block S” From what I understand, MSU has the link trademarked in every color known. A year or so back, Syracuse tried to do a link but MSU filed suit. As a result, Syracuse now uses a link over top.

Does anybody have pictures/grabs of the USC player whose pants were so ripped vs ND that it was held together with tape?

Mike

[quote comment=”24905″]I personally do not see the big deal with the use of the logos by high school teams. In NY there are many high school teams that I know of that use another teams logo. link uses the exact same helmet as the University of Georgia, and link uses the “G” that is used by Georgia, Grambling, and most notably the Green Packers. The Florida State Spear logo is used by link, link, and link. link uses the Clemson Claw design, link uses the Michigan State Spartan (also only have logo on link like the Steelers), and link has the exact same helmet as UCONN. So to make sure that no other school uses a logo is absurd. There are far too many teams that do so to completely eliminate the imitation.[/quote]

As a graduate of Guilderland, this was really cool to see. Many moons ago, the unis had the clipper ship on them, as we were/are the Guilderland Flying Dutchmen.

It was different, but I much prefer that to the inane lack of creativity shown by so many other schools. How many more Patriots/Vikings/Tigers do we really need?

Maybe I missed it but Paul, I find it odd that you’d let Espn get away with using link

It has
a) ugly wide shoulders for a basketball jersey
b) strange sublimated pinstripes
c) different fonts for UNI and WATCH
d) white and black on the arm trim on the right side, but only black trim on the left side.

All in all it’s a very flawed jersey for a column about jerseys.

[quote comment=”24936″]Minna, I bet you like eye black just because it’s black. What would you think if the Vikings designed a black alternate jersey?

Oh, and thanks to those who answered my goalie mask question yesterday.[/quote]

*Died and went to heaven*

Man, Burrill. You guys are all over me today. I would be extremely happy if the Vikes had a black alternate, something akin to link—without the ugly gold. I would definitely buy one of those. Oh, it can’t just be the jersey—it has to be the whole uniform. Then, if they traded for Troy P….

[quote comment=”24943″][quote comment=”24936″]Minna, I bet you like eye black just because it’s black. What would you think if the Vikings designed a black alternate jersey?

Oh, and thanks to those who answered my goalie mask question yesterday.[/quote]

*Died and went to heaven*

Man, Burrill. You guys are all over me today. I would be extremely happy if the Vikes had a black alternate, something akin to link—without the ugly gold. I would definitely buy one of those. Oh, it can’t just be the jersey—it has to be the whole uniform. Then, if they traded for Troy P….[/quote]

and what about the eye black of another former Viking – Chris Hovan

[quote comment=”24942″]Maybe I missed it but Paul, I find it odd that you’d let Espn get away with using link

It has
a) ugly wide shoulders for a basketball jersey
b) strange sublimated pinstripes
c) different fonts for UNI and WATCH
d) white and black on the arm trim on the right side, but only black trim on the left side.

All in all it’s a very flawed jersey for a column about jerseys.[/quote]

Someone also pointed out in the past that the jersey lacks Vertically Arched Letters, despite the fact that Paul is a great devotee of it in uniforms (or at least seems to be).

[quote comment=”24944″]

and what about the eye black of another former Viking – Chris Hovan[/quote]

Richard, he was never a favorite of mine. link, he just looks plain stupid. I like his top tattoo, though.

Cooley, XYZ Homie!

Plus the “W” Po-Leece need to stop by Chantilly, VA and have a talk with Westfields High School about their use of the famed “Flying W”. Quick question, does it matter where on the player the “W” is located, cause Westfields only has it on their pants, not on their helmets.

Westfields Bulldogs

[quote comment=”24942″]Maybe I missed it but Paul, I find it odd that you’d let Espn get away with using link

It has
a) ugly wide shoulders for a basketball jersey
b) strange sublimated pinstripes
c) different fonts for UNI and WATCH
d) white and black on the arm trim on the right side, but only black trim on the left side.

All in all it’s a very flawed jersey for a column about jerseys.[/quote]

Josh, I agree. This is not an eye-pleasing jersey. Paul, that should be your next mission: a dream jersey (perhaps the Packers’?) to adorn your column. You owe it to Uni Watching Land.

[quote comment=”24947″] Cooley, XYZ Homie![/quote]

link

BJ L, huh? Please explain!

[quote comment=”24933″][quote comment=”24928″]I have hated the red pants from the day that the Redskins abandoned their cool yellow pants . . . how long has it been now, 25 or 30 years ago? The white-on-white was a welcome and long overdue change, so it is my hope that the red pants were a one-week aberration.[/quote]

link > link.[/quote]

Nice linkage. However, I must stick with my firmly-held belief that NFL teams should NEVER wear pants in a color other that white, silver, gray, gold or yellow.

And red is the worst. It looks great on many college teams, but in the pros? No way.

That trademark site is great. The Washington Capitals trademarked a logo thats now dead, but they never used. The Florida Panthers have their logo trademarked in Spanish, the Carolina Hurricanes have some alternate logos (now dead) that were TM’d, the “Orlando Devil Rays” is trademarked by the TB group, and theres probably a ton more out there. Very cool. Perhaps Paul could do a whole UW blog on never used trademarked logos!

My old high school, Lodi, uses the Rams alternate logo and the Broncos stripe on their helmet.
While their opponent, Lenape Valley, is using the old Patriots logo.

link

Lodi’s opponent in last years state championship game also used the K-State logo.

link

[quote comment=”24949″][quote comment=”24942″]Maybe I missed it but Paul, I find it odd that you’d let Espn get away with using link

It has
a) ugly wide shoulders for a basketball jersey
b) strange sublimated pinstripes
c) different fonts for UNI and WATCH
d) white and black on the arm trim on the right side, but only black trim on the left side.

All in all it’s a very flawed jersey for a column about jerseys.[/quote]

Josh, I agree. This is not an eye-pleasing jersey. Paul, that should be your next mission: a dream jersey (perhaps the Packers’?) to adorn your column. You owe it to Uni Watching Land.[/quote]

Let’s put it this way: I’m not in a position to make any demands of the ESPN folks. Just be glad they publish my stuff.

And we’ve got a nice logo here on this site.

[quote comment=”24899″]what, no references of the 1957 throwbacks the Browns wore? Or did we all not really notice?

didn’t check so much into yesterday’s thread in case I missed the big discussion.[/quote]

Richard, they were mentioned here and there throughout the last couple days. Consensus is that the unis are better than the team.

I remember someone mentioning that Florida State gives out “Academics” tomahawks but it was very hard to distinguish them from the other tomahawks. But while watching the UF-FSU game Saturday, I thought I saw a few tomahawks with different looking handles on them. You can definitely see some differences here.
link

and here.
link

[quote comment=”24956″]
Let’s put it this way: I’m not in a position to make any demands of the ESPN folks. Just be glad they publish my stuff.

And we’ve got a nice logo here on this site.[/quote]

Aw, phooey on ESPN. I am grateful, Paul, that they publish your column—otherwise I would have been lonely in my uniform obsession. Thanks for providing a lively outlet for this particular quirk.

[quote comment=”24959″]
Aw, phooey on ESPN. I am grateful, Paul, that they publish your column—otherwise I would have been lonely in my uniform obsession. Thanks for providing a lively outlet for this particular quirk.[/quote]

As would I for my obsessive-compulsive problem with NHL jerseys.

Paul, you’ve done the world a fine service. Now if only the powers-that-be in the sports world would listen. ;o)

Kinda disappointed that the link Paul linked to in his article didn’t make any stickers with the link flag.

The Bears player probably had the logo torn or had it come loose during the game and thus it was removed.

The Vikings player probably had white socks on, just like the other player in the pic, but has his ankle spatted with black tape, which would cover the white sock.

[quote comment=”24928″][quote comment=”24897″][quote comment=”24881″]You forgot to mention that the Redskins finally went back to wearing the correct White over Burgandy uniforms for yesterday’s game.
-V[/quote]

AMEN! It’s about time the Redskins looked like the Redskins. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that they actually played like the Redskins yesterday too! Hopefully the white-on-white Bullsh*t is in the past.[/quote]

I must disagree. I have hated the red pants from the day that the Redskins abandoned their cool yellow pants . . . how long has it been now, 25 or 30 years ago? The white-on-white was a welcome and long overdue change, so it is my hope that the red pants were a one-week aberration.[/quote]

I agree wtih Dan. As a Redskins fan I must say that I welcome the change to the white pants. I think it looks much more sleek and classy. The Skins have managed to update their look without getting all crazy with new logos and all. However, I do not endorse completely burning the burgundy pants, but maybe break them out once/year for Dallas or something.

Minna, it occurred to me that I think we have at least a few Photoshop-minded folks here who might be able to create a black Vikes alternate for your personal edification. Only if they are willing, of course.

Me, I’m not so great on the Photoshop end. I much prefer the other side of photography.

[quote comment=”24951″][quote comment=”24947″] Cooley, XYZ Homie![/quote]

link

BJ L, huh? Please explain![/quote]

cooley’s zipper is down (XYZ = examine your zipper)

[quote comment=”24954″]That trademark site is great. The Washington Capitals trademarked a logo thats now dead, but they never used. The Florida Panthers have their logo trademarked in Spanish, the Carolina Hurricanes have some alternate logos (now dead) that were TM’d, the “Orlando Devil Rays” is trademarked by the TB group, and theres probably a ton more out there. Very cool. Perhaps Paul could do a whole UW blog on never used trademarked logos![/quote]

The site wouldn’t work for me. Dang it.

[quote comment=”24961″][quote comment=”24959″]
Aw, phooey on ESPN. I am grateful, Paul, that they publish your column—otherwise I would have been lonely in my uniform obsession. Thanks for providing a lively outlet for this particular quirk.[/quote]

As would I for my obsessive-compulsive problem with NHL jerseys.

Paul, you’ve done the world a fine service. Now if only the powers-that-be in the sports world would listen. ;o)[/quote]

Teebz, this is like a support group.

Hi, my name is Minna, {Hi, Minna}. I am an obsessed uni-watcher, and I-I-I don’t know where to turn. I can be watching a game, say, the Vikes-Cards, perfectly content to see my boys getting some offense going when wham! I am struck anew by how stupid the new unis are. {Preach it, Minna}. For the rest of the game, all I can do is think about the travesty that is the Viking uniform. I need help!

If it’s wrong to be uni-obsessed, then I don’t want to be right.

[quote comment=”24958″]I remember someone mentioning that Florida State gives out “Academics” tomahawks but it was very hard to distinguish them from the other tomahawks. But while watching the UF-FSU game Saturday, I thought I saw a few tomahawks with different looking handles on them. You can definitely see some differences here.
link

and here.
link

dave, it looks like those “different looking handles” are actually just holes in the helmet.

WVU Tom Wrote:

Interesting bit about the Wisconsin Ã¢â‚¬Å“WÃ¢â‚¬Â copyright. I have never been a fan of the popular practice of high-schools mimicing college or professional logos (while usually just changing the color scheme), and it seems to happen a lot.

I was really interested in this article though, because last year while visiting back home I attended a football game at my old high school Ã¢â‚¬” whose name I wonÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t mention to prevent being a Ã¢â‚¬Å“whistle-blowerÃ¢â‚¬Â, but my home town begins with the letter Ã¢â‚¬Å“WÃ¢â‚¬Â. I was disappointed because their old, very original Ã¢â‚¬Å“WÃ¢â‚¬Â logo, had been replaced with one that basically mimiced the Wisconsin Ã¢â‚¬Å“WÃ¢â‚¬Â. With any luck, this new devolopement will prompt school officals to revert back to the old one.

as a fellow mountaineer and former west virginia high school football player, i can only think of maybe two schools in the state that use that logo. one being at the top of the northern panhandle. but they’ve used it for a long time. any hints at what school you’re talking about? i gotta know.

[quote comment=”24968″][quote comment=”24951″][quote comment=”24947″] Cooley, XYZ Homie![/quote]

link

BJ L, huh? Please explain![/quote]

cooley’s zipper is down (XYZ = examine your zipper)[/quote]

Thanks, kevlay. I haven’t heard that expression in a loooong time. That takes me back.

[quote comment=”24946″][quote comment=”24944″]

and what about the eye black of another former Viking – Chris Hovan[/quote]

Richard, he was never a favorite of mine. link, he just looks plain stupid. I like his top tattoo, though.[/quote]

link used to be his length – similar to Randle.

Re: Ben Wallace not being allowed to wear a headband.

Look assjack, you’re being paid $60,000,000 over 5 years, so I think you can survive not being allowed to wear a headband. Shut up and start scoring some fucking points. The fact that he’s bitching and bleating and acting like a huge crybaby about this shows how much of a spoiled and coddled douche he truly is.

And as for Lucas’s comment that headbands prevent sweat from getting in your eyes, please. The only way to prevent that would be to stitch or staple the eyelids shut or wear the headband so low that it covers your eyes.

[quote comment=”24969″][quote comment=”24954″]That trademark site is great. The Washington Capitals trademarked a logo thats now dead, but they never used. The Florida Panthers have their logo trademarked in Spanish, the Carolina Hurricanes have some alternate logos (now dead) that were TM’d, the “Orlando Devil Rays” is trademarked by the TB group, and theres probably a ton more out there. Very cool. Perhaps Paul could do a whole UW blog on never used trademarked logos![/quote]

The site wouldn’t work for me. Dang it.[/quote]

Robert, I had a problem at first, too. Click on the trademark button after opening the link. Go to the glossary to the term TESS. Click on the link. Click on the first link—New User Form Search (Basic). Plug in what you want to find. This should work.

[quote comment=”24975″][quote comment=”24946″][quote comment=”24944″]

and what about the eye black of another former Viking – Chris Hovan[/quote]

Richard, he was never a favorite of mine. link, he just looks plain stupid. I like his top tattoo, though.[/quote]

link used to be his length – similar to Randle.[/quote]

Uh, no. Just say no, Chris. It doesn’t look right on his pasty skin. Thanks for the graphic, Richard. Now, I just need to get it out of my mind.

[quote comment=”24977″]Re: Ben Wallace not being allowed to wear a headband.

Look assjack, you’re being paid $60,000,000 over 5 years, so I think you can survive not being allowed to wear a headband. Shut up and start scoring some fucking points. The fact that he’s bitching and bleating and acting like a huge crybaby about this shows how much of a spoiled and coddled douche he truly is.

And as for Lucas’s comment that headbands prevent sweat from getting in your eyes, please. The only way to prevent that would be to stitch or staple the eyelids shut or wear the headband so low that it covers your eyes.[/quote]

Whoa, with the animosity. Someone put his crankypants on this morning (and I betcha’ they’re purple)! I can handle the occasional profanity, but could we control the profanity-laced tirades? Thanks.

Oh, and for the Trademark site, you can just go the the US Patents and Trademarks Office main link and click on “Search” in the navigational bar on the right hand side.

Now link is definately an excellent uniform.

[quote comment=”24977″]Re: Ben Wallace not being allowed to wear a headband.

Look assjack, you’re being paid $60,000,000 over 5 years, so I think you can survive not being allowed to wear a headband. Shut up and start scoring some fucking points. The fact that he’s bitching and bleating and acting like a huge crybaby about this shows how much of a spoiled and coddled douche he truly is.

And as for Lucas’s comment that headbands prevent sweat from getting in your eyes, please. The only way to prevent that would be to stitch or staple the eyelids shut or wear the headband so low that it covers your eyes.[/quote]

Ben, true. Big Ben should just play. On the other hand, Skiles should take the stick out of his ass. I think this sums it up perfectly:

link. Start mid-page with Now we have Headbandgate.

It’s micromanaging like this that really ticks people off—no matter how much money they make. Save the heavyhandedness for something that really matters, Skiles.

[quote comment=”24965″]Minna, it occurred to me that I think we have at least a few Photoshop-minded folks here who might be able to create a black Vikes alternate for your personal edification. Only if they are willing, of course.

Me, I’m not so great on the Photoshop end. I much prefer the other side of photography.[/quote]

That’s a great idea, Burrill. Ok, you Photoshop-heads out there. I’m putting out a call for a black-alternate Vikings uni that looks great. Who is up to the challenge?

[quote comment=”24979″][quote comment=”24975″][quote comment=”24946″][quote comment=”24944″]

and what about the eye black of another former Viking – Chris Hovan[/quote]

Richard, he was never a favorite of mine. link, he just looks plain stupid. I like his top tattoo, though.[/quote]

link used to be his length – similar to Randle.[/quote]

Uh, no. Just say no, Chris. It doesn’t look right on his pasty skin. Thanks for the graphic, Richard. Now, I just need to get it out of my mind.[/quote]

At least his hair was normal…his pre-long hair days…

[quote comment=”24986″]
At least his hair was normal…his pre-long hair days…[/quote]

Yeah, but, Richard, you should know by now that I have a predilection for looooooong hair. Let’s just face it: Hovan is not a good-looking man.

[quote comment=”24978″][quote comment=”24969″][quote comment=”24954″]That trademark site is great. The Washington Capitals trademarked a logo thats now dead, but they never used. The Florida Panthers have their logo trademarked in Spanish, the Carolina Hurricanes have some alternate logos (now dead) that were TM’d, the “Orlando Devil Rays” is trademarked by the TB group, and theres probably a ton more out there. Very cool. Perhaps Paul could do a whole UW blog on never used trademarked logos![/quote]

The site wouldn’t work for me. Dang it.[/quote]

Robert, I had a problem at first, too. Click on the trademark button after opening the link. Go to the glossary to the term TESS. Click on the link. Click on the first link—New User Form Search (Basic). Plug in what you want to find. This should work.[/quote]

Excellent. Thanks.

[quote comment=”24985″][quote comment=”24965″]Minna, it occurred to me that I think we have at least a few Photoshop-minded folks here who might be able to create a black Vikes alternate for your personal edification. Only if they are willing, of course.

Me, I’m not so great on the Photoshop end. I much prefer the other side of photography.[/quote]

That’s a great idea, Burrill. Ok, you Photoshop-heads out there. I’m putting out a call for a black-alternate Vikings uni that looks great. Who is up to the challenge?[/quote]

Why black? Black alts are so cliche in today’s NFL. The Jags, the Ravens, the Lions. Why can’t a team come up with something else for an alt jersey. I know NFL uniform restrictions make it difficult to come up with something really unique but something has to be done with the black schtick.

And, since most on here agree that purple is a color not fit for sports uniforms then why not sending out a call for the Photoshop guys (who I am one of and may experiment sometime soon with the uniform thing) to come up with a whole new color scheme? Something a little better than purple and yellow.

Why can’t they ditch link and put link on a navy blue ball cap.
P.S. I’m not giving up on this, until they do.
(I think I’m gonna be around for a while)

wow! what a holiday. i havent been keeping up with the blog like usual due to the “holiday bender” TM. this is different than the “sunday bender” TM, however the “holiday bender” TM can take place on a sunday in which you have an overlap of “benders”. in other words, ive been drinking since last tuesday…

anyway, in seeing all of the info on trademarking, i noticed, that the term “gets it” had a TM behind it. it looks like luk followed the steps of pat riley “three-pete” and john calipari “refuse to lose” in trademarking a saying.

i guess there will be new gear like mugs and mouse pads that say “i get it!” with the uniwatch logo beneath it…

[quote comment=”24964″][quote comment=”24928″][quote comment=”24897″][quote comment=”24881″]You forgot to mention that the Redskins finally went back to wearing the correct White over Burgandy uniforms for yesterday’s game.
-V[/quote]

AMEN! It’s about time the Redskins looked like the Redskins. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that they actually played like the Redskins yesterday too! Hopefully the white-on-white Bullsh*t is in the past.[/quote]

I must disagree. I have hated the red pants from the day that the Redskins abandoned their cool yellow pants . . . how long has it been now, 25 or 30 years ago? The white-on-white was a welcome and long overdue change, so it is my hope that the red pants were a one-week aberration.[/quote]

I agree wtih Dan. As a Redskins fan I must say that I welcome the change to the white pants. I think it looks much more sleek and classy. The Skins have managed to update their look without getting all crazy with new logos and all. However, I do not endorse completely burning the burgundy pants, but maybe break them out once/year for Dallas or something.[/quote]

According to the Post, the players approached Gibbs asking to make the change. Ironically, the move to the all-white began with the Rams game last year, and started the winning streak at the end of last season.

I’d love to see gold pants, as well as the gold “R” helmet that Lombardi brought to the club when he coached there (wanted them to look like the Packers – nothin’ wrong with that).

[quote comment=”24977″]Re: Ben Wallace not being allowed to wear a headband.

Look assjack, you’re being paid $60,000,000 over 5 years, so I think you can survive not being allowed to wear a headband. Shut up and start scoring some fucking points. The fact that he’s bitching and bleating and acting like a huge crybaby about this shows how much of a spoiled and coddled douche he truly is.

And as for Lucas’s comment that headbands prevent sweat from getting in your eyes, please. The only way to prevent that would be to stitch or staple the eyelids shut or wear the headband so low that it covers your eyes.[/quote]

Whoa! Breathe! It’s not that big of a deal, really!

[quote comment=”24953″][quote comment=”24933″][quote comment=”24928″]I have hated the red pants from the day that the Redskins abandoned their cool yellow pants . . . how long has it been now, 25 or 30 years ago? The white-on-white was a welcome and long overdue change, so it is my hope that the red pants were a one-week aberration.[/quote]

link > link.[/quote]

Nice linkage. However, I must stick with my firmly-held belief that NFL teams should NEVER wear pants in a color other that white, silver, gray, gold or yellow.

And red is the worst. It looks great on many college teams, but in the pros? No way.[/quote]

I COULDN’T AGREE WITH YOU MORE!!! NFL teams should stay away from red and blue and black pants. It just looks like a high school team.

[quote comment=”24990″][quote comment=”24985″]

That’s a great idea, Burrill. Ok, you Photoshop-heads out there. I’m putting out a call for a black-alternate Vikings uni that looks great. Who is up to the challenge?[/quote]

Why black? Black alts are so cliche in today’s NFL. The Jags, the Ravens, the Lions. Why can’t a team come up with something else for an alt jersey. I know NFL uniform restrictions make it difficult to come up with something really unique but something has to be done with the black schtick.

And, since most on here agree that purple is a color not fit for sports uniforms then why not sending out a call for the Photoshop guys (who I am one of and may experiment sometime soon with the uniform thing) to come up with a whole new color scheme? Something a little better than purple and yellow.[/quote]

Pat, the black is for me personally as black is my favorite color. I liked the old school Vikings’ unis, but not these. Burrill was just suggesting it because he knows of my love for all things black. If you want to try another color, I would be open to it—but be forewarned that I probably will not like it as much as a black alternate.

[quote comment=”24955″]My old high school, Lodi, uses the Rams alternate logo and the Broncos stripe on their helmet.
While their opponent, Lenape Valley, is using the old Patriots logo.

link

Lodi’s opponent in last years state championship game also used the K-State logo.

link

I remember reading somewhere that K-State is very liberal in licensing the Powercat to High Schools, for something like $1 a year. link is a list of high schools that are licensed to use the logo. Chatham doesn’t appear to be on that list…

[quote comment=”24977″]Re: Ben Wallace not being allowed to wear a headband.

Look assjack, you’re being paid $60,000,000 over 5 years, so I think you can survive not being allowed to wear a headband. Shut up and start scoring some fucking points. The fact that he’s bitching and bleating and acting like a huge crybaby about this shows how much of a spoiled and coddled douche he truly is.

And as for Lucas’s comment that headbands prevent sweat from getting in your eyes, please. The only way to prevent that would be to stitch or staple the eyelids shut or wear the headband so low that it covers your eyes.[/quote]

While I actually agree with you on most of your points, you need to chill out. One of the reasons I like this comment section is the lack of animosity people show here, and the general sense of community amongst Uni-Watch readers.

It seems more and more (on other sites) that people hide behind screen names and fire insults at one another (and public figures) from their ivory towers. So I find this site refreshing because not only does Paul put a lot of time and effort in, but the readers are so passionate and thorough in their posts.

By the way, I wasn’t offended by your post, and I apologize for the soap box speach, but if you go through past comment sections, you’ll probably see almost zero posts similar to yours. I really hope that doesn’t change.

[quote comment=”24992″]wow! what a holiday. i havent been keeping up with the blog like usual due to the “holiday bender” TM. this is different than the “sunday bender” TM, however the “holiday bender” TM can take place on a sunday in which you have an overlap of “benders”. in other words, ive been drinking since last tuesday…

anyway, in seeing all of the info on trademarking, i noticed, that the term “gets it” had a TM behind it. it looks like luk followed the steps of pat riley “three-pete” and john calipari “refuse to lose” in trademarking a saying.

i guess there will be new gear like mugs and mouse pads that say “i get it!” with the uniwatch logo beneath it…[/quote]

I love this idea. I would absolutely buy a Uni Watch mousepad, especially if it had ‘I get it!’ written on it. Paul, can we make this happen?

As for Ben, dude, you make good points and make up interesting words (assjack? that’s a new one to me), but this isn’t the Jim Rome Show.

I’m a huge fan of alternate uniforms, except when they’re overused like the Mets black uniform and a certain Cubs pitcher who apparently only feels good wearing blue–[cough] Zambrano [cough]–but the spate of black jerseys in all leagues is getting out of control. I’m glad the NBA nixed all black alternates this year, it’s forced some teams (like the Jazz) to be more creative. And in the end, isn’t that a large part of uniform design?

[quote comment=”24970″]
Hi, my name is Minna, {Hi, Minna}. I am an obsessed uni-watcher, and I-I-I don’t know where to turn. I can be watching a game, say, the Vikes-Cards, perfectly content to see my boys getting some offense going when wham! I am struck anew by how stupid the new unis are. {Preach it, Minna}. For the rest of the game, all I can do is think about the travesty that is the Viking uniform. I need help!

If it’s wrong to be uni-obsessed, then I don’t want to be right.[/quote]

Testify, sister. Testify. :o)

This may be stating the already-seen, but over recent years and trips to Michigan Basketball games, I’ve noticed that sometimes Lester Abram, and many opponents have uber nike logos on their socks. They have two and sometimes three logos (from three different socks/braces) visible at a time on the back of their legs. Somewhat disturbing, sorry for no photo evidence, but I think it has been witnessed before.

No time to read any comments above but did anyone notice the guy wearing link

[quote comment=”24990″][quote comment=”24985″][quote comment=”24965″]Minna, it occurred to me that I think we have at least a few Photoshop-minded folks here who might be able to create a black Vikes alternate for your personal edification. Only if they are willing, of course.

Me, I’m not so great on the Photoshop end. I much prefer the other side of photography.[/quote]

That’s a great idea, Burrill. Ok, you Photoshop-heads out there. I’m putting out a call for a black-alternate Vikings uni that looks great. Who is up to the challenge?[/quote]

Why black? Black alts are so cliche in today’s NFL. The Jags, the Ravens, the Lions. Why can’t a team come up with something else for an alt jersey. I know NFL uniform restrictions make it difficult to come up with something really unique but something has to be done with the black schtick.

And, since most on here agree that purple is a color not fit for sports uniforms then why not sending out a call for the Photoshop guys (who I am one of and may experiment sometime soon with the uniform thing) to come up with a whole new color scheme? Something a little better than purple and yellow.[/quote]

Um…aren’t Ravens black in real life? Cliche or not I think they should wear black jerseys.

Lions and Jaguars…you have a point.

[quote comment=”25000″]I would absolutely buy a Uni Watch mousepad, especially if it had ‘I get it!’ written on it. Paul, can we make this happen?[/quote]

Actually, we’re about to get bunch of new Uni Watch products up for sale — travel mugs, tote bags, trucker caps, etc. And everything (including the stuff we already have, like t-shirts and coffee mugs) will be available in two logo designs: the one we’ve been using (i.e., the one at the top of this page), plus link. More on all of this soon.

Does anyone still use a mouse pad?

Kind of relating to the ESPN article: During the Giants Game, Devin Hester of the Bears was wearing one long black stripe of tape, with smaller white stripes running vertically through the sticker. It was clearly visible on most shots of him before he returned punts and on the sideline after the FG return for a TD. Did anyone Tivo this game, and if so, can you get a screen shot? I cant find any pictures where his face is visible.

Although it pains me to admit I watch this crap. Lots of eyeblack on a guy from link

[quote comment=”24995″][quote comment=”24953″][quote comment=”24933″][quote comment=”24928″]I have hated the red pants from the day that the Redskins abandoned their cool yellow pants . . . how long has it been now, 25 or 30 years ago? The white-on-white was a welcome and long overdue change, so it is my hope that the red pants were a one-week aberration.[/quote]

link > link.[/quote]

Nice linkage. However, I must stick with my firmly-held belief that NFL teams should NEVER wear pants in a color other that white, silver, gray, gold or yellow.

And red is the worst. It looks great on many college teams, but in the pros? No way.[/quote]

I COULDN’T AGREE WITH YOU MORE!!! NFL teams should stay away from red and blue and black pants. It just looks like a high school team.[/quote]

High school team? No I don’t see it.

What looks high school is putting the team name in big block letters above the numbers. I believe some colleges do this, i.e. Oklahoma.

Dark colored pants have been around for decades so I think they look fine on certain teams.

[quote comment=”24999″][quote comment=”24977″]Re: Ben Wallace not being allowed to wear a headband.

Look assjack, you’re being paid $60,000,000 over 5 years, so I think you can survive not being allowed to wear a headband. Shut up and start scoring some fucking points. The fact that he’s bitching and bleating and acting like a huge crybaby about this shows how much of a spoiled and coddled douche he truly is.

And as for Lucas’s comment that headbands prevent sweat from getting in your eyes, please. The only way to prevent that would be to stitch or staple the eyelids shut or wear the headband so low that it covers your eyes.[/quote]

While I actually agree with you on most of your points, you need to chill out. One of the reasons I like this comment section is the lack of animosity people show here, and the general sense of community amongst Uni-Watch readers.

It seems more and more (on other sites) that people hide behind screen names and fire insults at one another (and public figures) from their ivory towers. So I find this site refreshing because not only does Paul put a lot of time and effort in, but the readers are so passionate and thorough in their posts.

By the way, I wasn’t offended by your post, and I apologize for the soap box speach, but if you go through past comment sections, you’ll probably see almost zero posts similar to yours. I really hope that doesn’t change.[/quote]

If he’s an honest to God Bulls fan he has a right to be steamed.
The guy got the free agent contract of the year.

If he’s a regular Joe fan then I agree with you the guy should chill out.

[quote comment=”24991″]Why can’t they ditch link and put link on a navy blue ball cap.
P.S. I’m not giving up on this, until they do.
(I think I’m gonna be around for a while)[/quote]

I dunno man, I like the current bluejays logo, but I also used to love this logo.

link

I had an old bluejays hat as a kid. I had no idea where Toronto was. I just loved the hat. Being from St. Louis, I got a lot of strange looks.

No love for Ben Wallace on here, eh? Personally when I first read that Skiles put in that rule I thought: Is ya crazay, trying to put down your monster player, just so you can be all uppity?

Big deal is right, it goes both ways, innit? What’s the big deal with letting Big Ben wear his headband…is the only way his Fro looks cool? Why even go there? I thought Skiles was a good coach, to me he’s blowing it with this sophomoric show of “Who’s Da Boss”…

[quote comment=”24993″][quote comment=”24964″][quote comment=”24928″][quote comment=”24897″][quote comment=”24881″]You forgot to mention that the Redskins finally went back to wearing the correct White over Burgandy uniforms for yesterday’s game.
-V[/quote]

AMEN! It’s about time the Redskins looked like the Redskins. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that they actually played like the Redskins yesterday too! Hopefully the white-on-white Bullsh*t is in the past.[/quote]

I must disagree. I have hated the red pants from the day that the Redskins abandoned their cool yellow pants . . . how long has it been now, 25 or 30 years ago? The white-on-white was a welcome and long overdue change, so it is my hope that the red pants were a one-week aberration.[/quote]

I agree wtih Dan. As a Redskins fan I must say that I welcome the change to the white pants. I think it looks much more sleek and classy. The Skins have managed to update their look without getting all crazy with new logos and all. However, I do not endorse completely burning the burgundy pants, but maybe break them out once/year for Dallas or something.[/quote]

According to the Post, the players approached Gibbs asking to make the change. Ironically, the move to the all-white began with the Rams game last year, and started the winning streak at the end of last season.

I’d love to see gold pants, as well as the gold “R” helmet that Lombardi brought to the club when he coached there (wanted them to look like the Packers – nothin’ wrong with that).[/quote]

Serious??

I wouldn’t mind seeing the gold pants return but the gold helmet – no thanks.

I think there is something wrong trying to look like another team! That’s what the original Bengals and Paul Brown did to copy the Browns.
How about being original.

Why would a Redskins fan want to honor Lombardi that much?

I do think that after Gibbs retires – they will get a new logo to appease the Native American tribes who oppose the name Redskins.

Thanks Burril for the the links to the Menominee vs. Madison game!

Seriously folks, have you ever come across something more ridiculous than an entire team that looks like link?

I’ve never been a big fan of Menominee’s link, but coming from a school that wears link I can’t say too much. Our old unis were cheap ripoffs of the old purple/gold Vikings unis, and I liked them better than what we have now, but since I’m defending purple here, I’ll just stop now.

[quote comment=”24941″][quote comment=”24905″]I personally do not see the big deal with the use of the logos by high school teams. In NY there are many high school teams that I know of that use another teams logo. link uses the exact same helmet as the University of Georgia, and link uses the “G” that is used by Georgia, Grambling, and most notably the Green Packers. The Florida State Spear logo is used by link, link, and link. link uses the Clemson Claw design, link uses the Michigan State Spartan (also only have logo on link like the Steelers), and link has the exact same helmet as UCONN. So to make sure that no other school uses a logo is absurd. There are far too many teams that do so to completely eliminate the imitation.[/quote]

As a graduate of Guilderland, this was really cool to see. Many moons ago, the unis had the clipper ship on them, as we were/are the Guilderland Flying Dutchmen.

It was different, but I much prefer that to the inane lack of creativity shown by so many other schools. How many more Patriots/Vikings/Tigers do we really need?[/quote]

I remember my elementary school, St. Gemma. The mascot was the Shamrocks. The old helmet was white and had a cool shamrock logo. Then, about ten to fifteen years ago, they went with the generic Green Bay Packers “G.”

I miss the shamrock.

[quote comment=”25013″][quote comment=”24991″]Why can’t they ditch link and put link on a navy blue ball cap.
P.S. I’m not giving up on this, until they do.
(I think I’m gonna be around for a while)[/quote]

I dunno man, I like the current bluejays logo, but I also used to love this logo.

link

I had an old bluejays hat as a kid. I had no idea where Toronto was. I just loved the hat. Being from St. Louis, I got a lot of strange looks.[/quote]

I don’t like the new Jays logo either. I was always a big fan of the original one (Doug Ault, Steve Staggs, Otto Velez….those were the days). They blew it with all those logos they had after the original.

[quote comment=”24940″]Does anybody have pictures/grabs of the USC player whose pants were so ripped vs ND that it was held together with tape?

Mike[/quote]

The player you’re talking about is RB CJ Gable (#25). Couldn’t find a picture of him where you can see the rip in the back of his pants, but you can easily see the tape job in this pic…

[quote comment=”25022″][quote comment=”24940″]Does anybody have pictures/grabs of the USC player whose pants were so ripped vs ND that it was held together with tape?

Mike[/quote]

The player you’re talking about is RB CJ Gable (#25). Couldn’t find a picture of him where you can see the rip in the back of his pants, but you can easily see the tape job in this pic…[/quote]

link

[quote comment=”25008″]Although it pains me to admit I watch this crap. Lots of eyeblack on a guy from link[/quote]

oh no! you have to say that shit loud! i am a proud fan of mtv reality shows, ESPECIALLY laguna beach. one day there was a marathon on mtv. i happened to sit down on a saturday afternoon at like 1 pm… i totally got roped into the lives of these rich high school kids. i think i ended up watching 13 consecutive hours of laguna beach. can i say that i have virtually every “real world” dvd release. thats complete seasons, bloopers, never seen footage, etc.

[quote comment=”24916″][quote comment=”24915″]Paul is there legally a difference between a logo and just a letter? Because the “w” on the Wisconsin helmet is slanted it counts as a picture not a letter? I would find it hard to believe somebody could copywrite a letter (like the connecticut C, its a block letter c).[/quote]

I know I am not Paul, but I might be able to shed some light here. What you are more likely to see than a copyright in this situation is a link. This matters for more than just the definition of “trademark” versus “copyright.” Trademarks can be renewed indefinitely, as long as they are used in commerce. Copyrights can eventually become public property. You can trademark anything that is representative of your product. That includes a letter, a font, a logo, or even a color. The government keeps a database called the link, or link.

It is a lot of fun to look up your link and see everything that they have trademarked. For instance, the Yankees still have the New York Highlanders trademarked.[/quote]

The Brewers still hold onto the Seattle Pilots TM too….not to mention the NBA, which holds onto the trademarks of all the old ABA teams they drove out of business like the Miami Floridians…

And if you ever want to use ‘Frankford Yellowjackets’ on a shirt, the NFL will get ya too!

[quote comment=”24941″][quote comment=”24905″]I personally do not see the big deal with the use of the logos by high school teams. In NY there are many high school teams that I know of that use another teams logo. link uses the exact same helmet as the University of Georgia, and link uses the “G” that is used by Georgia, Grambling, and most notably the Green Packers. The Florida State Spear logo is used by link, link, and link. link uses the Clemson Claw design, link uses the Michigan State Spartan (also only have logo on link like the Steelers), and link has the exact same helmet as UCONN. So to make sure that no other school uses a logo is absurd. There are far too many teams that do so to completely eliminate the imitation.[/quote]

As a graduate of Guilderland, this was really cool to see. Many moons ago, the unis had the clipper ship on them, as we were/are the Guilderland Flying Dutchmen.

It was different, but I much prefer that to the inane lack of creativity shown by so many other schools. How many more Patriots/Vikings/Tigers do we really need?[/quote]

Us up here in Michigan have the creativity you’ve been starving for… Burrill can agree, I remember he’s from Chelsea (Bulldogs, pretty uncreative). Over here in rival Dexter, we’re the Dreadnaughts, and teams in our conference include the Fighting Mules of Temperance Bedford, and the Maples of Adrian. Michigan is creative in other places as well (see ESPN commercials about the Nimrods of Watersmeet), but nothing beats the ol’ SEC conference for creativity. Though, I regret to say, we have a team that is basically solely PURPLE (Ann Arbor Pioneer), and just outside Ann Arbor, another team we play has PURPLE and gold (Ypsilanti)

[quote comment=”24972″]WVU Tom Wrote:

Interesting bit about the Wisconsin Ã¢â‚¬Å“WÃ¢â‚¬Â copyright. I have never been a fan of the popular practice of high-schools mimicing college or professional logos (while usually just changing the color scheme), and it seems to happen a lot.

I was really interested in this article though, because last year while visiting back home I attended a football game at my old high school Ã¢â‚¬” whose name I wonÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t mention to prevent being a Ã¢â‚¬Å“whistle-blowerÃ¢â‚¬Â, but my home town begins with the letter Ã¢â‚¬Å“WÃ¢â‚¬Â. I was disappointed because their old, very original Ã¢â‚¬Å“WÃ¢â‚¬Â logo, had been replaced with one that basically mimiced the Wisconsin Ã¢â‚¬Å“WÃ¢â‚¬Â. With any luck, this new devolopement will prompt school officals to revert back to the old one.

as a fellow mountaineer and former west virginia high school football player, i can only think of maybe two schools in the state that use that logo. one being at the top of the northern panhandle. but they’ve used it for a long time. any hints at what school you’re talking about? i gotta know.[/quote]

I did go to school at WVU, but my high school days were spent in north/central MD.

[quote comment=”25028″][quote comment=”24972″]WVU Tom Wrote:

Interesting bit about the Wisconsin Ã¢â‚¬Å“WÃ¢â‚¬Â copyright. I have never been a fan of the popular practice of high-schools mimicing college or professional logos (while usually just changing the color scheme), and it seems to happen a lot.

I was really interested in this article though, because last year while visiting back home I attended a football game at my old high school Ã¢â‚¬” whose name I wonÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t mention to prevent being a Ã¢â‚¬Å“whistle-blowerÃ¢â‚¬Â, but my home town begins with the letter Ã¢â‚¬Å“WÃ¢â‚¬Â. I was disappointed because their old, very original Ã¢â‚¬Å“WÃ¢â‚¬Â logo, had been replaced with one that basically mimiced the Wisconsin Ã¢â‚¬Å“WÃ¢â‚¬Â. With any luck, this new devolopement will prompt school officals to revert back to the old one.

as a fellow mountaineer and former west virginia high school football player, i can only think of maybe two schools in the state that use that logo. one being at the top of the northern panhandle. but they’ve used it for a long time. any hints at what school you’re talking about? i gotta know.[/quote]

I did go to school at WVU, but my high school days were spent in north/central MD.[/quote]

Sorry, I’m using a different computer–just want to verify that I, “WVU Tom” am the same “Tom” that made the above post.

[quote comment=”25027″][quote comment=”24941″][quote comment=”24905″]I personally do not see the big deal with the use of the logos by high school teams. In NY there are many high school teams that I know of that use another teams logo. link uses the exact same helmet as the University of Georgia, and link uses the “G” that is used by Georgia, Grambling, and most notably the Green Packers. The Florida State Spear logo is used by link, link, and link. link uses the Clemson Claw design, link uses the Michigan State Spartan (also only have logo on link like the Steelers), and link has the exact same helmet as UCONN. So to make sure that no other school uses a logo is absurd. There are far too many teams that do so to completely eliminate the imitation.[/quote]

As a graduate of Guilderland, this was really cool to see. Many moons ago, the unis had the clipper ship on them, as we were/are the Guilderland Flying Dutchmen.

It was different, but I much prefer that to the inane lack of creativity shown by so many other schools. How many more Patriots/Vikings/Tigers do we really need?[/quote]

Us up here in Michigan have the creativity you’ve been starving for… Burrill can agree, I remember he’s from Chelsea (Bulldogs, pretty uncreative). Over here in rival Dexter, we’re the Dreadnaughts, and teams in our conference include the Fighting Mules of Temperance Bedford, and the Maples of Adrian. Michigan is creative in other places as well (see ESPN commercials about the Nimrods of Watersmeet), but nothing beats the ol’ SEC conference for creativity. Though, I regret to say, we have a team that is basically solely PURPLE (Ann Arbor Pioneer), and just outside Ann Arbor, another team we play has PURPLE and gold (Ypsilanti)[/quote]

Andrew man, why you gotta be hating on my high school? Its ok though, you are allowed to being that you don’t have to walk in the front doors with a big sign that says PURPLE PRIDE ever day. Other than the kicking mules, I personally enjoy Ann Arbor’s other public high school’s name (and a high school I also attended at one time) Huron High School River Rats. Complete with a simpson’s -ish looking river rat for its logo.

my high school being Ann Arbor Pioneer, which i feel has some very classy football unis (burril, could you help me out with some pics?)

from todays page 2 article…

Ã¢â‚¬Â¢ DeSean Jackson: The Cal wideout wears “THA1” (here’s a closer look), which means either he’s still using his high school nickname (he was known as “Tha Chosen One” back at Long Beach Poly) or else he’s a big fan of Neo.

THA1? are you serious? i hope the last character is an awkward capital i, and that he is trying to write the word THAI. but c’mon, THA 1?
so now we are going out of our way to mispell articles? tha… what an idiot.

Favre is wearing a black undershirt in tonight’s game…cannot remember when black was an official Green Bay color. Just an interesting tidbit.

[quote comment=”24905″]I personally do not see the big deal with the use of the logos by high school teams. In NY there are many high school teams that I know of that use another teams logo. link uses the exact same helmet as the University of Georgia, and link uses the “G” that is used by Georgia, Grambling, and most notably the Green Packers. The Florida State Spear logo is used by link, link, and link. link uses the Clemson Claw design, link uses the Michigan State Spartan (also only have logo on link like the Steelers), and link has the exact same helmet as UCONN. So to make sure that no other school uses a logo is absurd. There are far too many teams that do so to completely eliminate the imitation.[/quote]

link‘s the Columbia helmet (click the little magnifying glass to see it a little better). I can’t tell if it has the outline like UConn’s or not.
This helmet is new this year. They used to use a lion logo, as that is their mascot.
Regardless, changing to the block C on the helmet probably has to do with the link, who came from UConn this year.

[quote comment=”24956″]

Let’s put it this way: I’m not in a position to make any demands of the ESPN folks. Just be glad they publish my stuff.

And we’ve got a nice logo here on this site.[/quote]

Hey Paul, maybe you can ask ESPN to replace their uni watch logo with link. Hehehe.

Well, I can’t find a pic of my old high school’s helmet logo (the wisconsin-esque “W”), but I did find another blatant rip off, which you can see here in the schools offical athetic logo:

link
If it doesn’t look familiar, see this:

link

Of course, this isn’t as bad as one of our other county rivals, North Carroll HS:

link

[quote comment=”25027″]Andrew man, why are you hating on my high school? Its ok though, you are allowed to being that you don’t have to walk in the front doors with a big sign that says PURPLE PRIDE ever day. Other than the kicking mules, I personally enjoy Ann Arbor’s other public high school’s name (and a high school I also attended at one time) Huron High School River Rats. Complete with a simpson’s -ish looking river rat for its logo.[/quote]

I want a River Rats tshirt. The high school I went to had the stupidest mascot…River Forest Ingots. Yes, an Ingot, like a hunk of metal (steel country). Our opponents didn’t even know what the mascot was. They all called us River Rats.

I know we have discussed this before but looks some Tiger world champ shirts got released in Detroit this year.

link

By the was Ben, Paul spells his name “Lukas”

[quote comment=”25006″][quote comment=”25000″]I would absolutely buy a Uni Watch mousepad, especially if it had ‘I get it!’ written on it. Paul, can we make this happen?[/quote]

Actually, we’re about to get bunch of new Uni Watch products up for sale — travel mugs, tote bags, trucker caps, etc. And everything (including the stuff we already have, like t-shirts and coffee mugs) will be available in two logo designs: the one we’ve been using (i.e., the one at the top of this page), plus link. More on all of this soon.

Does anyone still use a mouse pad?[/quote]
Make those trucker caps big Paul, some of us have bigger domes than others!

[quote comment=”25039″][quote comment=”25027″]

I want a River Rats tshirt. The high school I went to had the stupidest mascot…River Forest Ingots. Yes, an Ingot, like a hunk of metal (steel country). Our opponents didn’t even know what the mascot was. They all called us River Rats.[/quote]

also bad is my high school alma mater, the University School Suns. our colors were green and white (the school would throw a yellow/gold in randomly, but stuck more to green/white than green/white/gold)

[quote comment=”25036″][quote comment=”24905″]I personally do not see the big deal with the use of the logos by high school teams. In NY there are many high school teams that I know of that use another teams logo. link uses the exact same helmet as the University of Georgia, and link uses the “G” that is used by Georgia, Grambling, and most notably the Green Packers. The Florida State Spear logo is used by link, link, and link. link uses the Clemson Claw design, link uses the Michigan State Spartan (also only have logo on link like the Steelers), and link has the exact same helmet as UCONN. So to make sure that no other school uses a logo is absurd. There are far too many teams that do so to completely eliminate the imitation.[/quote]

link‘s the Columbia helmet (click the little magnifying glass to see it a little better). I can’t tell if it has the outline like UConn’s or not.
This helmet is new this year. They used to use a lion logo, as that is their mascot.
Regardless, changing to the block C on the helmet probably has to do with the link, who came from UConn this year.[/quote]

I think he meant a Columbia High School somewhere in New York, not Columbia University. At least that’s what I took from the post.

[quote comment=”25039″][quote comment=”25027″]Andrew man, why are you hating on my high school? Its ok though, you are allowed to being that you don’t have to walk in the front doors with a big sign that says PURPLE PRIDE ever day. Other than the kicking mules, I personally enjoy Ann Arbor’s other public high school’s name (and a high school I also attended at one time) Huron High School River Rats. Complete with a simpson’s -ish looking river rat for its logo.[/quote]

I want a River Rats tshirt. The high school I went to had the stupidest mascot…River Forest Ingots. Yes, an Ingot, like a hunk of metal (steel country). Our opponents didn’t even know what the mascot was. They all called us River Rats.[/quote]

What is it with steel? It is as though we in “Steel Country” have this obsessive need to respect where we came from with our sports teams, but we can’t all be the Steelers. The Ingots and the new Phillies AAA team (discussed about a week ago on this board) the IronPigs. Crazy.

[quote comment=”25033″]my high school being Ann Arbor Pioneer, which i feel has some very classy football unis (burril, could you help me out with some pics?)[/quote]

You know me too well.

I’m not sure if the SEC gets a ton of points for creativity, but I’ll run through it with as many photos as I have.

First, I don’t have pictures of the varsity, but here are the JV unis for the link.
As you requested, the Ann Arbor Pioneer Pioneers — link and link.
The Dexter link — cool name with a cartoony muscular ship as a logo. Though they tend to call themselves the Dreads, which makes them sound a bit like a hairstyle.
The Saline Hornets — the previously mentioned link and link.
The link.
The Tecumseh Indians (home) — perhaps Minna’s link.
The link.
And my own team, the blandly-named Chelsea Bulldogs: link, link, and short-lived link.

The Huron River Rats are set to join the SEC next year, and the still-unnamed (and not yet completed) third Ann Arbor school will also join the conference. (Some are pushing for Schembechler High; I don’t see the city going for that.)

I think one of my favorite school names in Michigan was the Plymouth Rocks. Unfortunately, things changed, and now they’re the Canton Rocks, which doesn’t have the same ring.

Just wanted to share link rather refreshing spin on the NikeWorld b-ball uni. Not a good look at the shoulder stripe, but we all know what they look like, right? Does it surprise you that this look comes to us from a classy U like Penn State?

By the way, two former members of the SEC are the Pinckney Pirates and another Minna-friendly team: the link.

Actually, if I remember correctly, the Pirates were also prone to fits of black.

Hmm. Cold, snow, wind. No black pants on the refs.

I’m starting to think they can’t bring themselves to wear them.

[quote comment=”25048″][quote comment=”25033″]my high school being Ann Arbor Pioneer, which i feel has some very classy football unis (burril, could you help me out with some pics?)[/quote]

I think one of my favorite school names in Michigan was the Plymouth Rocks. Unfortunately, things changed, and now they’re the Canton Rocks, which doesn’t have the same ring.[/quote]

not to rain on your parade…but canton is the chiefs, salem is the rocks, and plymouth, as you stated dissappointingly, is the predators (wanna guess which nhl team’s logo they use?) and yes, i liked the rocks as well. anyone that can be proud to say they are a rock, and sport a caveman on a jersey, is ok in my books.

[quote comment=”25046″]

What is it with steel? It is as though we in “Steel Country” have this obsessive need to respect where we came from with our sports teams, but we can’t all be the Steelers. The Ingots and the new Phillies AAA team (discussed about a week ago on this board) the IronPigs. Crazy.[/quote]

Where I grew up (by Gary, Indiana) the mills are closing anyway so it is not even a source of pride anymore. I guess now it just reminds the kids that they won’t have high paying mill jobs when they graduate high school. Maybe they should change the mascot to something more realistic…’the janitors’ or perhaps ‘the crackheads.’

[quote comment=”25051″]Hmm. Cold, snow, wind. No black pants on the refs.

I’m starting to think they can’t bring themselves to wear them.[/quote]

I’m with TD and have been wondering the same thing. We can only hope for a phase out of the new shirts.

[quote comment=”25052″][quote comment=”25048″][quote comment=”25033″]my high school being Ann Arbor Pioneer, which i feel has some very classy football unis (burril, could you help me out with some pics?)[/quote]

I think one of my favorite school names in Michigan was the Plymouth Rocks. Unfortunately, things changed, and now they’re the Canton Rocks, which doesn’t have the same ring.[/quote]

not to rain on your parade…but canton is the chiefs, salem is the rocks, and plymouth, as you stated dissappointingly, is the predators (wanna guess which nhl team’s logo they use?) and yes, i liked the rocks as well. anyone that can be proud to say they are a rock, and sport a caveman on a jersey, is ok in my books.[/quote]

Dang. I know there’s a giant conglomeration of schools there, but I couldn’t remember how they were configured. Thanks for the correction.

Check out the Loyola Collge Prep Flyers helmets link from Shreveport, LA.

They actually got written permission in the 60’s or 70’s from Charles Schultz to use the logo. Still have the letter framed at the school.

The references to ‘Columbia’ up yonder are to Columbia High School in East Greenbush, NY, not Columbia University in NYC.

[quote comment=”25044″][quote comment=”25036″][quote comment=”24905″]I personally do not see the big deal with the use of the logos by high school teams. In NY there are many high school teams that I know of that use another teams logo. link uses the exact same helmet as the University of Georgia, and link uses the “G” that is used by Georgia, Grambling, and most notably the Green Packers. The Florida State Spear logo is used by link, link, and link. link uses the Clemson Claw design, link uses the Michigan State Spartan (also only have logo on link like the Steelers), and link has the exact same helmet as UCONN. So to make sure that no other school uses a logo is absurd. There are far too many teams that do so to completely eliminate the imitation.[/quote]

link‘s the Columbia helmet (click the little magnifying glass to see it a little better). I can’t tell if it has the outline like UConn’s or not.
This helmet is new this year. They used to use a lion logo, as that is their mascot.
Regardless, changing to the block C on the helmet probably has to do with the link, who came from UConn this year.[/quote]

I think he meant a Columbia High School somewhere in New York, not Columbia University. At least that’s what I took from the post.[/quote]

Yeah thats my fault, I meant Columbia High School in Section 2 NY.

[quote comment=”25055″][quote comment=”25051″]Hmm. Cold, snow, wind. No black pants on the refs.

I’m starting to think they can’t bring themselves to wear them.[/quote]

I’m with TD and have been wondering the same thing. We can only hope for a phase out of the new shirts.[/quote]

I agree. I think the refs have a lot more sense than the league.

[quote comment=”25058″]Check out the Loyola Collge Prep Flyers helmets link from Shreveport, LA.

They actually got written permission in the 60’s or 70’s from Charles Schultz to use the logo. Still have the letter framed at the school.[/quote]

Brings back memories of Oregon’s use of Donald Duck. Oh, the good ole’ days!

[quote comment=”25059″]The references to ‘Columbia’ up yonder are to Columbia High School in East Greenbush, NY, not Columbia University in NYC.[/quote]

Of course, SOME of us actually stuck around to attend high school up there instead of traipsing off to some fancy schmancy prep school! :-)

I’m watching the Packers Seahawks game and I think that Charles Woodson looks absolutely amazing. He looks like he is just wearing socks. It looks very smooth. Just thought i would point it out.

Thanks for posting the article, I hope it draws more attention to this issue. I think Wisconsin is doing a diservice by enforcing a trademark on the letter “W”.

Gret point joe about Wisconsin should heavily recruit the schools who have a similar “W”.

I donÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t have any pictures, but during the Texas-Texas A&M game, on tv you could see that there were quite a few A&M players whoÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s Ã¢â‚¬Å“aTmÃ¢â‚¬Â helmet decal was peeling off.

Those decals are very crappy. I received a set of decals directly from A+M a few years ago and they peel up on the edges. I don’t know how the majority stay on the helmets during games!

[quote comment=”25006″]

Does anyone still use a mouse pad?[/quote]

Raises hand defiantly. I use a mouse pad. A black one, gel-filled, with a black mouse. I am old-school. Then again, I don’t have a cell phone or a scanner or a digital camera. Call me a Luddite.

[quote comment=”25050″]By the way, two former members of the SEC are the Pinckney Pirates and another Minna-friendly team: the link.

Actually, if I remember correctly, the Pirates were also prone to fits of black.[/quote]

You are too good to me, Burrill. I like the two black-clad teams you mentioned, but I have a problem with the name of the Tecumseh school. Still, I like the unis. I also like the term ‘Minna-friendly’. Keep ’em coming.

[quote comment=”25040″]I know we have discussed this before but looks some Tiger world champ shirts got released in Detroit this year.

link

By the was Ben, Paul spells his name “Lukas”[/quote]

I know of one store in Iowa that ordered both Cardinals and Tigers Champions gear before the series was over…and the new manager (as in he graduated from college in August and this is his first real job) FORGOT to cancel the order on the Tigers gear. T-shirts? $4. Hats? $5. Miscellaneous souvenirs? $1 to $3. Being a Cardinals fan, I had to laugh…

I remember hearing once that the manufacturers send the gear of the losing team (that says they won) overseas, mostly to 3rd world countries.

Much like how MLB.com has link shirt for sale for atleast 24 hours after the Cards beat the Mets.

and I managed to find the article I mentioned the first time around…link

After reading it, makes me wonder just what company this store went through (obviously not a top one) if the primary manufacturers only produce for the winners…

Just for the record, on the Native American team mascots, it’s generally not Native Americans who are offended by their use. It’s more typically white policy makers and PC watchdogs who take it upon themselves to decide for the rest of the world what is to be deemed offensive and incorrect.

[quote comment=”24929″]I totally intended to mention Randle — really! But I couldn’t find a good photo of him. And one reason for that was, I’m embarrassed to say, is that I mistakenly searched for pics of “John Randall.” How lame is that?! ARGGHHH!

I’ll mention Randle (and your great Courtney Love comparison) in a follow-up in my next column.[/quote]

Thanks for the props, Paul. I also was unlucky in my search for a good picture of Randle in all his Bravehart-ish war paint. I did find a picture of some white guy in a bowling shirt, however.

As far as Chris Hovan goes, well, he has other uni-related issues to work on first.

[quote comment=”25076″]Just for the record, on the Native American team mascots, it’s generally not Native Americans who are offended by their use. It’s more typically white policy makers and PC watchdogs who take it upon themselves to decide for the rest of the world what is to be deemed offensive and incorrect.[/quote]

Just for the record, that’s not true, and I’m not white. You don’t see a team called the crackers or the honkies, do you? You don’t see people doing mock-masses at a ball-game as that would be deemed sacreligious. It’s more that the indigenous people have bigger problems and nobody in power gives a damn what the indigenous people think, anyway. It’s not PC to be respectful; it’s people who don’t want to bother to change the way they think that hurl the PC label.

Read link or link or link or link or link before speaking for all of indigenous people.

The last post was for godeep mizzou. Obviously, I screwed up my post.

[quote comment=”25079″]You don’t see a team called the crackers or the honkies, do you?[/quote]

Um, link…

[quote comment=”25081″][quote comment=”25079″]You don’t see a team called the crackers or the honkies, do you?[/quote]

Um, link…[/quote]

Damn it, Paul! You know how to ruin a perfectly good righteous rant, don’t you? That’s what I get for not checking my facts; how ironic. The astounding part is that there were the Atlanta Black Crackers as well. Next time, I have to find a different example.

Sigh.

link

Why does link have so many teams tattoed? And why the NFL logo?!

I understand that they could be temporary tattoos…but 1.) Not many men put on THAT many. 2.) He’s got multiple teams

[quote comment=”25083″]Why does link have so many teams tattoed? And why the NFL logo?!

I understand that they could be temporary tattoos…but 1.) Not many men put on THAT many. 2.) He’s got multiple teams[/quote]

Wow, Allison. That is a die-hard Vikings’ fan. I was going to say the other logos were the teams the Vikes have played so far, but they haven’t played the Bucs. I also thought the other logos were temporaries, but I can’t be sure. That is not an attractive display, that’s for sure.

[quote comment=”24975″][quote comment=”24946″][quote comment=”24944″]

and what about the eye black of another former Viking – Chris Hovan[/quote]

Richard, he was never a favorite of mine. link, he just looks plain stupid. I like his top tattoo, though.[/quote]

link used to be his length – similar to Randle.[/quote]

No one yet has mentioned how ridiculous and stinkass ugly the neck collar and sleeve striping looks on his Boston College uni. It looks like they just repeated the letters BC over and over again to create a BCBCBCBCBCBCBCBC pattern.

[quote comment=”25035″]Favre is wearing a black undershirt in tonight’s game…cannot remember when black was an official Green Bay color. Just an interesting tidbit.[/quote]He was wearing link, but it probably looked black because it was wet.

[quote comment=”24958″]I remember someone mentioning that Florida State gives out “Academics” tomahawks but it was very hard to distinguish them from the other tomahawks.[/quote]
It looks like link has an academic tomahawk. As was already pointed out, link‘ look odd because of the holes in his helmet.

Academic tomahawks have a feather on the handle and an “A” in the head.

[quote comment=”25049″]Just wanted to share link rather refreshing spin on the NikeWorld b-ball uni. Not a good look at the shoulder stripe, but we all know what they look like, right? Does it surprise you that this look comes to us from a classy U like Penn State?[/quote]

I’m sure we’ve all seen worse, like the opponent in the foto. What is up with those goofy stripes on the legs? And another comment about b.ball uniforms, pretty soon they aren’t going to be shorts, we already got a lot past the knees, looks utterly ridiculous, next, prom dresses! = D

About the UWM’s W what exactly is so great about it that so many HS are copying it? The throwback uni’s they sported earlier this year with the old helmets look sooooooo much better:

[quote comment=”25079″][quote comment=”25076″]Just for the record, on the Native American team mascots, it’s generally not Native Americans who are offended by their use. It’s more typically white policy makers and PC watchdogs who take it upon themselves to decide for the rest of the world what is to be deemed offensive and incorrect.[/quote]

Just for the record, that’s not true, and I’m not white. You don’t see a team called the crackers or the honkies, do you? You don’t see people doing mock-masses at a ball-game as that would be deemed sacreligious. It’s more that the indigenous people have bigger problems and nobody in power gives a damn what the indigenous people think, anyway. It’s not PC to be respectful; it’s people who don’t want to bother to change the way they think that hurl the PC label.

Read link or link or link or link or link before speaking for all of indigenous people.[/quote]

Thanks for your comment, there is always someone who brings this up, and yeah, one can go and fine someone of Native American ethnicity who sees no issue but I doubt we’d be having this discussion EVER if there was a team called the Blackskins (there would be protests non-stop and rightly so) or the Whiteskins (too un-PC and too many neo-Nazi types and white supremists would cheer for them which means most Americans would be against them).

It’s not that difficult really to change a team’s nickname, the Browns became the Crows, er Ravens. For specific tribes, e.g. the Seminoles, the Utes, etc. it can be uplifting.

Besides the Redskins uniform is ugly…they should use a darker red but I gues that would cause more protests. There absolutely is no reason why a high school, I’m talking to you, Tulsa Union, should ever use “Redskins!!! That is so disrespectful…

[quote comment=”25018″][quote comment=”24993″][quote comment=”24964″][quote comment=”24928″][quote comment=”24897″][quote comment=”24881″]You forgot to mention that the Redskins finally went back to wearing the correct White over Burgandy uniforms for yesterday’s game.
-V[/quote]

AMEN! It’s about time the Redskins looked like the Redskins. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that they actually played like the Redskins yesterday too! Hopefully the white-on-white Bullsh*t is in the past.[/quote]

I must disagree. I have hated the red pants from the day that the Redskins abandoned their cool yellow pants . . . how long has it been now, 25 or 30 years ago? The white-on-white was a welcome and long overdue change, so it is my hope that the red pants were a one-week aberration.[/quote]

I agree wtih Dan. As a Redskins fan I must say that I welcome the change to the white pants. I think it looks much more sleek and classy. The Skins have managed to update their look without getting all crazy with new logos and all. However, I do not endorse completely burning the burgundy pants, but maybe break them out once/year for Dallas or something.[/quote]

According to the Post, the players approached Gibbs asking to make the change. Ironically, the move to the all-white began with the Rams game last year, and started the winning streak at the end of last season.

I’d love to see gold pants, as well as the gold “R” helmet that Lombardi brought to the club when he coached there (wanted them to look like the Packers – nothin’ wrong with that).[/quote]

Serious??

I wouldn’t mind seeing the gold pants return but the gold helmet – no thanks.

I think there is something wrong trying to look like another team! That’s what the original Bengals and Paul Brown did to copy the Browns.
How about being original.

Why would a Redskins fan want to honor Lombardi that much?

I do think that after Gibbs retires – they will get a new logo to appease the Native American tribes who oppose the name Redskins.[/quote]

I crtainly hope not!

Besides… The ‘Skins dont do anything like the chant (Atlanta Braves) or the tomahak chop (FL Seminoles) or anyhing else that I think is more offensive thn just a name. Also, they are the one of the most profitable sports franchises on the planet, and let’s face it… everything comes down to the alighty dollar anyways. So I doubt that the ‘Skins will ever have to change there name. Dan (the worst thing to ever hapen to the Redskins) Snyder will just throw a lot of money at the problem and it will go away.

Back on topic…. I like the Burgandy over Gold that they wore for the 2003 70th anniversary season. White over Gold just looks ugly. But nothing will ever top the quinessential White over BUrundy Redskins.

-V

About the UWMÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s W what exactly is so great about it that so many HS are copying it? The throwback uniÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s they sported earlier this year with the old helmets look sooooooo much better:

UWM doesn’t have a football team.

[quote comment=”25101″][quote comment=”25018″][quote comment=”24993″][quote comment=”24964″][quote comment=”24928″][quote comment=”24897″][quote comment=”24881″]You forgot to mention that the Redskins finally went back to wearing the correct White over Burgandy uniforms for yesterday’s game.
-V[/quote]

AMEN! It’s about time the Redskins looked like the Redskins. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that they actually played like the Redskins yesterday too! Hopefully the white-on-white Bullsh*t is in the past.[/quote]

I must disagree. I have hated the red pants from the day that the Redskins abandoned their cool yellow pants . . . how long has it been now, 25 or 30 years ago? The white-on-white was a welcome and long overdue change, so it is my hope that the red pants were a one-week aberration.[/quote]

I agree wtih Dan. As a Redskins fan I must say that I welcome the change to the white pants. I think it looks much more sleek and classy. The Skins have managed to update their look without getting all crazy with new logos and all. However, I do not endorse completely burning the burgundy pants, but maybe break them out once/year for Dallas or something.[/quote]

According to the Post, the players approached Gibbs asking to make the change. Ironically, the move to the all-white began with the Rams game last year, and started the winning streak at the end of last season.

I’d love to see gold pants, as well as the gold “R” helmet that Lombardi brought to the club when he coached there (wanted them to look like the Packers – nothin’ wrong with that).[/quote]

Serious??

I wouldn’t mind seeing the gold pants return but the gold helmet – no thanks.

I think there is something wrong trying to look like another team! That’s what the original Bengals and Paul Brown did to copy the Browns.
How about being original.

Why would a Redskins fan want to honor Lombardi that much?

I do think that after Gibbs retires – they will get a new logo to appease the Native American tribes who oppose the name Redskins.[/quote]

I crtainly hope not!

Besides… The ‘Skins dont do anything like the chant (Atlanta Braves) or the tomahak chop (FL Seminoles) or anyhing else that I think is more offensive thn just a name. Also, they are the one of the most profitable sports franchises on the planet, and let’s face it… everything comes down to the alighty dollar anyways. So I doubt that the ‘Skins will ever have to change there name. Dan (the worst thing to ever hapen to the Redskins) Snyder will just throw a lot of money at the problem and it will go away.

Back on topic…. I like the Burgandy over Gold that they wore for the 2003 70th anniversary season. White over Gold just looks ugly. But nothing will ever top the quinessential White over BUrundy Redskins.

-V[/quote]

another thing…. do any of you know why George Preston Marshall changed the name from Braves to Redskins? link

[quote comment=”25058″]Check out the Loyola Collge Prep Flyers helmets link from Shreveport, LA.

They actually got written permission in the 60’s or 70’s from Charles Schultz to use the logo. Still have the letter framed at the school.[/quote]
I’ve always loved Loyola’s helmets!

[quote comment=”25101″][quote comment=”25018″][quote comment=”24993″][quote comment=”24964″][quote comment=”24928″][quote comment=”24897″][quote comment=”24881″]You forgot to mention that the Redskins finally went back to wearing the correct White over Burgandy uniforms for yesterday’s game.
-V[/quote]

AMEN! It’s about time the Redskins looked like the Redskins. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that they actually played like the Redskins yesterday too! Hopefully the white-on-white Bullsh*t is in the past.[/quote]

I must disagree. I have hated the red pants from the day that the Redskins abandoned their cool yellow pants . . . how long has it been now, 25 or 30 years ago? The white-on-white was a welcome and long overdue change, so it is my hope that the red pants were a one-week aberration.[/quote]

I agree wtih Dan. As a Redskins fan I must say that I welcome the change to the white pants. I think it looks much more sleek and classy. The Skins have managed to update their look without getting all crazy with new logos and all. However, I do not endorse completely burning the burgundy pants, but maybe break them out once/year for Dallas or something.[/quote]

According to the Post, the players approached Gibbs asking to make the change. Ironically, the move to the all-white began with the Rams game last year, and started the winning streak at the end of last season.

I’d love to see gold pants, as well as the gold “R” helmet that Lombardi brought to the club when he coached there (wanted them to look like the Packers – nothin’ wrong with that).[/quote]

Serious??

I wouldn’t mind seeing the gold pants return but the gold helmet – no thanks.

I think there is something wrong trying to look like another team! That’s what the original Bengals and Paul Brown did to copy the Browns.
How about being original.

Why would a Redskins fan want to honor Lombardi that much?

I do think that after Gibbs retires – they will get a new logo to appease the Native American tribes who oppose the name Redskins.[/quote]

I crtainly hope not!

Besides… The ‘Skins dont do anything like the chant (Atlanta Braves) or the tomahak chop (FL Seminoles) or anyhing else that I think is more offensive thn just a name. Also, they are the one of the most profitable sports franchises on the planet, and let’s face it… everything comes down to the alighty dollar anyways. So I doubt that the ‘Skins will ever have to change there name. Dan (the worst thing to ever hapen to the Redskins) Snyder will just throw a lot of money at the problem and it will go away.

Back on topic…. I like the Burgandy over Gold that they wore for the 2003 70th anniversary season. White over Gold just looks ugly. But nothing will ever top the quinessential White over BUrundy Redskins.

-V[/quote]

I think Dan Snyder has done well. I mean, at least he is willing to spend the money, even if it doesn’t end up working out (Deion, Jeff George, etc.) Unlike Bill Bidwell in Arizona…

Besides… The ‘Skins dont do anything like the chant (Atlanta Braves) or the tomahak chop (FL Seminoles) or anyhing else that I think is more offensive thn just a name. Also, they are the one of the most profitable sports franchises on the planet, and let’s face it… everything comes down to the alighty dollar anyways. So I doubt that the ‘Skins will ever have to change there name. Dan (the worst thing to ever hapen to the Redskins) Snyder will just throw a lot of money at the problem and it will go away.

Back on topic…. I like the Burgandy over Gold that they wore for the 2003 70th anniversary season. White over Gold just looks ugly. But nothing will ever top the quinessential White over BUrundy Redskins.

-V[/quote]

For the record I would only be an advocate for a logo change – keep the name and colors. The logo is a bit offensive when combined with the name and an update would be a step towards PC without going too far (ie Washington Bullets become Wizards)It’s not like a logo retirement is the end of the world.

And I’d wait for Gibbs to go – for history’s sake.

Re: Ben Wallace.

He’s a punk with no class or manners, plain and simple.

His latest comments about the whole headband thing prove that.

Wallace said, “If you know the rules and break them, you expect to be punished. I can’t try to put myself above the team or anybody else and wear a headband like I did. I’m amn enough to take the punishment. But I’m not sorry.”

When asked why he did it Wallace said, “I just felt like wearing it.”

How in the world is that not putting yourself above your team and anyone else?

If Skiles has any balls he’ll bench Wallace until he learns his lesson and apologizes to the team and Skiles.

The Washington Redskins tried to activate a change last season and then started on a winning streak (here comes the white pants and jerseys) and so Dan gets all superstitious and decides to hold off. The change was sweet. Think black.

Next year is their 75th Anniversary so you’ll be seeing something to celebrate that big event.

Footnote: The NFL only allows a team to wear an anniversary uniform 3 times in a season, twice in the regular season and once in the pre-season, so it will only be a tease but all and all a good conversation topic for sports branding and uni blogs everywhere.

[quote comment=”25288″]The Washington Redskins tried to activate a change last season and then started on a winning streak (here comes the white pants and jerseys) and so Dan gets all superstitious and decides to hold off. The change was sweet. Think black.

Next year is their 75th Anniversary so you’ll be seeing something to celebrate that big event.

Footnote: The NFL only allows a team to wear an anniversary uniform 3 times in a season, twice in the regular season and once in the pre-season, so it will only be a tease but all and all a good conversation topic for sports branding and uni blogs everywhere.[/quote]

How is the logo offensive? It does not show an offensive pose or gesture… it looks no worse than a coin… link.

I hope and pray every day that the ‘Skins don’t go black. That would be a huge mistake, and about 8 years behind the black is cool wave that many teams in most sports, unfortunatly, rode. See link, link, and link for a few examples. Black Redskins uniforms would only further lock Dan in first place for the worst thing to ever happen to the Burgandy and Gold.

Footnote reply: If a team declares there “anniversary uniform” as there regular game unis, they can wear said uniform for the whole season. That is how they wore the retro styled ones in 8 regular season games in the 70’th season (7 home & 1 in Dallas; they wore White over Burgundy at home against Dallas because the cowboys are cursed in blue).

-V

[quote comment=”25102″]About the UWMÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s W what exactly is so great about it that so many HS are copying it? The throwback uniÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s they sported earlier this year with the old helmets look sooooooo much better:

UWM doesn’t have a football team.[/quote]I could’ve swore the main campus is in link….I stand corrected.

[quote comment=”25103″][quote comment=”25101″][quote comment=”25018″][quote comment=”24993″][quote comment=”24964″][quote comment=”24928″][quote comment=”24897″][quote comment=”24881″]You forgot to mention that the Redskins finally went back to wearing the correct White over Burgandy uniforms for yesterday’s game.
-V[/quote]

AMEN! It’s about time the Redskins looked like the Redskins. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that they actually played like the Redskins yesterday too! Hopefully the white-on-white Bullsh*t is in the past.[/quote]

I must disagree. I have hated the red pants from the day that the Redskins abandoned their cool yellow pants . . . how long has it been now, 25 or 30 years ago? The white-on-white was a welcome and long overdue change, so it is my hope that the red pants were a one-week aberration.[/quote]

I agree wtih Dan. As a Redskins fan I must say that I welcome the change to the white pants. I think it looks much more sleek and classy. The Skins have managed to update their look without getting all crazy with new logos and all. However, I do not endorse completely burning the burgundy pants, but maybe break them out once/year for Dallas or something.[/quote]

According to the Post, the players approached Gibbs asking to make the change. Ironically, the move to the all-white began with the Rams game last year, and started the winning streak at the end of last season.

I’d love to see gold pants, as well as the gold “R” helmet that Lombardi brought to the club when he coached there (wanted them to look like the Packers – nothin’ wrong with that).[/quote]

Serious??

I wouldn’t mind seeing the gold pants return but the gold helmet – no thanks.

I think there is something wrong trying to look like another team! That’s what the original Bengals and Paul Brown did to copy the Browns.
How about being original.

Why would a Redskins fan want to honor Lombardi that much?

I do think that after Gibbs retires – they will get a new logo to appease the Native American tribes who oppose the name Redskins.[/quote]

I crtainly hope not!

Besides… The ‘Skins dont do anything like the chant (Atlanta Braves) or the tomahak chop (FL Seminoles) or anyhing else that I think is more offensive thn just a name. Also, they are the one of the most profitable sports franchises on the planet, and let’s face it… everything comes down to the alighty dollar anyways. So I doubt that the ‘Skins will ever have to change there name. Dan (the worst thing to ever hapen to the Redskins) Snyder will just throw a lot of money at the problem and it will go away.

Back on topic…. I like the Burgandy over Gold that they wore for the 2003 70th anniversary season. White over Gold just looks ugly. But nothing will ever top the quinessential White over BUrundy Redskins.

-V[/quote]

another thing…. do any of you know why George Preston Marshall changed the name from Braves to Redskins? link[/quote]

Vince,
Right back at cha! ; D

William Henry “Lone Star” Dietz (1884-1964) was the head coach of the Boston Redskins (now Washington Redskins) of the National Football League. George Preston Marshall, owner and founder of the franchise, sought to rename the Boston Braves after leaving the stadium they shared with the baseball team of the same name. He chose the name Boston Redskins in honor of Dietz, who falsely claimed to be part “Sioux”. In fact Dietz was entirely of European ancestry, as was proven by an Indian Country Today article.

[quote comment=”25352″][quote comment=”25103″][quote comment=”25101″][quote comment=”25018″][quote comment=”24993″][quote comment=”24964″][quote comment=”24928″][quote comment=”24897″][quote comment=”24881″]You forgot to mention that the Redskins finally went back to wearing the correct White over Burgandy uniforms for yesterday’s game.
-V[/quote]

AMEN! It’s about time the Redskins looked like the Redskins. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that they actually played like the Redskins yesterday too! Hopefully the white-on-white Bullsh*t is in the past.[/quote]

I must disagree. I have hated the red pants from the day that the Redskins abandoned their cool yellow pants . . . how long has it been now, 25 or 30 years ago? The white-on-white was a welcome and long overdue change, so it is my hope that the red pants were a one-week aberration.[/quote]

I agree wtih Dan. As a Redskins fan I must say that I welcome the change to the white pants. I think it looks much more sleek and classy. The Skins have managed to update their look without getting all crazy with new logos and all. However, I do not endorse completely burning the burgundy pants, but maybe break them out once/year for Dallas or something.[/quote]

According to the Post, the players approached Gibbs asking to make the change. Ironically, the move to the all-white began with the Rams game last year, and started the winning streak at the end of last season.

I’d love to see gold pants, as well as the gold “R” helmet that Lombardi brought to the club when he coached there (wanted them to look like the Packers – nothin’ wrong with that).[/quote]

Serious??

I wouldn’t mind seeing the gold pants return but the gold helmet – no thanks.

I think there is something wrong trying to look like another team! That’s what the original Bengals and Paul Brown did to copy the Browns.
How about being original.

Why would a Redskins fan want to honor Lombardi that much?

I do think that after Gibbs retires – they will get a new logo to appease the Native American tribes who oppose the name Redskins.[/quote]

I crtainly hope not!

Besides… The ‘Skins dont do anything like the chant (Atlanta Braves) or the tomahak chop (FL Seminoles) or anyhing else that I think is more offensive thn just a name. Also, they are the one of the most profitable sports franchises on the planet, and let’s face it… everything comes down to the alighty dollar anyways. So I doubt that the ‘Skins will ever have to change there name. Dan (the worst thing to ever hapen to the Redskins) Snyder will just throw a lot of money at the problem and it will go away.

Back on topic…. I like the Burgandy over Gold that they wore for the 2003 70th anniversary season. White over Gold just looks ugly. But nothing will ever top the quinessential White over BUrundy Redskins.

-V[/quote]

another thing…. do any of you know why George Preston Marshall changed the name from Braves to Redskins? link[/quote]

Vince,
Right back at cha! ; D

William Henry “Lone Star” Dietz (1884-1964) was the head coach of the Boston Redskins (now Washington Redskins) of the National Football League. George Preston Marshall, owner and founder of the franchise, sought to rename the Boston Braves after leaving the stadium they shared with the baseball team of the same name. He chose the name Boston Redskins in honor of Dietz, who falsely claimed to be part “Sioux”. In fact Dietz was entirely of European ancestry, as was proven by an Indian Country Today article.[/quote]

Well, that is news to me. Ever story that I have ever heard is exactly like the link I had posted. But regardless of what we now know about Lone Star Dietz, George Preston Marshall changed the team’s name to honor Lone Star & the Sioux based on what he knew about him in the 1930’s.

Join Uni Watch Plus!

Menu

Or Maybe He Just Needs to Spend More Time at the Salad Bar and Less Time at the Dessert Bar