NFL owners just approved the proposal to allow players to wear Number Zero, I’m told.
— Tom Pelissero (@TomPelissero) March 28, 2023
Exactly one month ago, reports began circulating that the Eagles had proposed restoring No. 0 as a legal NFL uni number. As you can see above, NFL Insider Tom Pelissero is now reporting that the proposal has been approved.
Update: We already have our first new hero of zero! The Jags have announced that wide receiver Calvin Ridley will wear No. 0:
Calvin Ridley will wear No. 0. #DUUUVAL pic.twitter.com/Recqc0Jgf9
— Jacksonville Jaguars (@Jaguars) March 28, 2023
Another update: It turns out that there’s another aspect to this rule change, namely that kickers and punters will now be able to wear numbers from 90 to 99! Check it out:
Meanwhile, here’s a copy/paste the post I wrote one month ago, which gives all the background info on the NFL’s history with zero (and double-zero, for that matter). Enjoy!
Reprinted from Feb. 28, 2023:
The Athletic is reporting that the Eagles have submitted a proposal to the NFL’s competition committee that would reinstate No. 0 as a legal uniform number. It’s not clear, at least to me, when the committee might vote on this proposal, nor is it clear which position(s) would be eligible to wear the number if the proposal is approved.
It’s been more than half a century since the NFL had a zero-clad player. The last one was Saints defensive back Obert Logan in 1967. Here are some shots of him wearing the goose egg:
For reasons that have never been clear to me, the NFL banished No. 0 from the field after 1967. I don’t know if any other team has proposed its reinstatement since then. (Anyone..?)
The NFL last adjusted its uni-numbering rules in 2021, when certain number ranges became available for certain positions. That change was the result of a proposal from Kansas City, which was running out of available roster number because of its large contingent of retired numbers.
The NCAA, after decades of disallowing No. 0 in college football, made it a legal uni number in 2020. The move has been popular with players and fans, with many schools using the number as an honorific to be earned or bestowed.
Still off-limits in both the pro and college ranks: double-zero. The NFL banned it in 1973, although wideout Ken Burrough was permitted to wear it on a grandfathered basis through 1981.
Personally, I’m hoping that the Eagles’ proposal is approved. Zeroes on the field (or court, or ice) are fun! And that brings up an intriguing question: If No. 0 is allowed, who on your favorite team should be the first player to wear it? I’ll go first: As a 49ers fan, I think quarterback Brock Purdy would be a perfect Hero of Zero. After all, he was Mr. Irrelevant, so what better way to symbolize that — and to underscore his unlikely star turn last season — than by wearing the number that symbolizes a whole lot of nothing?
Your turn — go!
(My thanks to Tony Miller, who was the first to bring Pelissero’s tweet to my attention; to Twitter-er @fillupg1, who let me know about the Jags’ tweet; and to Austin Maida, for pointing out the kickers/punters detail.)
Joe Burrow (CIN) seems a natural fit.
Aaron Rodgers should take #0 as QB of the Jets. It would be the hottest selling jersey
The strictly number-theory argument that persuades me to favor 0 as a legal number would also, if I applied it consistently, permit 00. But it would also on the same logic permit 01, 02, 03, etc as distinct from 1, 2, 3, etc. And that, I just can’t get on board with. So I’m cool with 0, but not 00.
You got that Ken Burrough energy
The NFL becomes gradually less and less visually appealing.
For some reason, single-digit numbers often look fine to me (depending on the size of the player wearing it), but 0 is one that just looks wrong. Maybe because it resembles the letter O, I don’t know.
00, on the other hand, looks balanced to me and I am fine with that.
If I had to choose one, I’d take 00.
But just having zero is better than nothing!
Having zero is equal to nothing.
I’ll let myself out…
George Plimpton gets ready for his comeback!
Paul, can there be a “log-in” button right at the top? Whenever I get logged out of UW+, it’s not obvious where to log-in without going clicking around for a bit and getting the “sign-up” pop-up after each click.
Will see what we can do.
I brought this up in the past and was greeted with lots of confusion.
I find that it’s much easier to do this on my phone with the hamburger widget at the top right. On the desktop version I have to scroll down to a link that is usually right under the top right sidebar ad.
Pleeease bring back 00.
Totally agree. A big defensive tackle wearing 00 would be fun!
I don’t know if any of the actual Eagles players could wear it, but it might look good on Rashard Penny. I suppose it’s more likely to see it on a rookie. (I have one oregonian in mind…)
Excuse me, I meant “current Eagles players”.
I’d like to see 00. I always wanted that number since my last name has double o’s. I thought it looked cool to have 00 below OO.
Georgia TE Darnell Washington wore 0 the last three seasons. 6’7”, he was known and beloved as The Big 0.
The important question is – how many mascots will be affected by this?
I had no idea 0 and 00 were banned. I just thought they were jokey numbers that nobody wanted.
I was kind of hoping kickers and punters could get even more numbers. Would have been nice to see another # 25 like Jim Bakken.
Still, I’m looking forward to seeing some of them wearing 90-99.
They can, take another look at the screenshot of the rule changes.